tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post3549220841488837486..comments2023-09-04T04:05:55.555-07:00Comments on Orangutan House: Decision 2008Orangutanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07056813274350801133noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-35103196668058371742008-09-30T00:46:00.000-07:002008-09-30T00:46:00.000-07:00shiren:很久不見了。其實也不算是甚麼觀點,不過平時看得多評論,隨便抄抄而已。shiren:很久不見了。其實也不算是甚麼觀點,不過平時看得多評論,隨便抄抄而已。Orangutanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07056813274350801133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-48126927628045061752008-09-29T18:03:00.000-07:002008-09-29T18:03:00.000-07:00小的大致上同意各觀點。另外,博主將之組織得很好,表達到不少我心裡的慨念,自己寫不來,讀到他人的是樂事...小的大致上同意各觀點。另外,博主將之組織得很好,表達到不少我心裡的慨念,自己寫不來,讀到他人的是樂事。shirenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00465373657627542127noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-9492156570592776542008-09-15T22:35:00.000-07:002008-09-15T22:35:00.000-07:00anonymous1 : 不熟悉香港政治環境,說不上有甚麼看法。只覺得比例代表制還可以接受,但功能組...anonymous1 : 不熟悉香港政治環境,說不上有甚麼看法。只覺得比例代表制還可以接受,但功能組別帶精英統治意識,就不太可取。<BR/><BR/>yun : 共產主義不符合人性,當然行不通。但完全由市場主導的資本主義,也是不符合人性的。只不過我們都看慣了聽慣了「發展」「增長」等詞語,忘記了經濟增長其實並不是人類社會最終的目的。<BR/><BR/>“you know how to spend your own money better than the government does” sounds very catchy and appealing, but the phrase is incomplete and deceptive. It should be “you know how to spend your own money TO SATISFY YOURSELF better than the government does.” I think history proves that, when a society is overwhelmed by rampant greed and selfishness, it’s doomed to fail. <BR/><BR/>small potato: 絕對歡迎討論,唔使唔好意思。<BR/><BR/>我也不贊成完全不開採,最近民主黨對 off-shore drilling 也軟化了。阿拉斯加 ANWAR,我則是反對開採的,但不是生態問題(講真,有幾多人會到阿拉斯加北極圈?),而是為了象徵性的意義。ANWAR 解決不了燃眉之急,卻永遠破壞了美國最後一片處女地,民主黨不應該讓步。<BR/><BR/>我不清楚中東鑽油的污染是不是比在美國嚴重。不過在中東開採的,也是美國英國法國的油公司,技術應該是相同的。而且化石能源污染,主要是燃燒時產生的溫室氣體的問題。<BR/><BR/>我覺得最重要的,還是兩黨的基本路線和決心。很多解決方法已經出現了(風力,電動汽車,green construction),需要的是政策的推動,和鼓勵更多投資。不改變現有政策的話,就算油井不枯,能十年二十年一直鑽下去,問題始終也存在,而且更難解決。<BR/><BR/>anonymous2 :Greenspan also said that McCain cannot finance his tax cut without cutting spending (and he is a Republican supporter). I am no economist. I reject Republican’s economic plan because, based on my sketchy understanding, trickle-down theory is not the answer to our problems.<BR/><BR/>I don’t take each candidate’s talking points too seriously. It’s all hot air with very little substance. For example, on a day which two of the biggest Wall Street institutions collapse under the pressure of a sour mortgage market, McCain blames the upheaval on government regulations (didn’t the whole sub-prime crisis happen because of lack of regulation?), and Obama, once again, finds his way to spin it against “last 8 years “ They are obviously just repeating what they want us to hear.Orangutanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07056813274350801133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-90532556933337410722008-09-14T03:06:00.000-07:002008-09-14T03:06:00.000-07:00If you look at McCain's economic policy, he has ne...If you look at McCain's economic policy, he has next to no chance of balancing the budget or reducing the national debt. His insistence to stay in Iraq also means the US will continue to spend trillions more over there. Trickle-down economy is as much an idealistic fantasy as communism. If McCain becomes president, expect the US economy to go deeper into recession.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-36464339557760923252008-09-13T13:30:00.000-07:002008-09-13T13:30:00.000-07:00首先講句唔好意思,我八卦插把口入黎,旨在提出我同樣有偏差的見解,沒挑起爭論的意思。關于共和黨傾向多開...首先講句唔好意思,我八卦插把口入黎,旨在提出我同樣有偏差的見解,沒挑起爭論的意思。<BR/><BR/>關于共和黨傾向多開取更多美國石油,其實這可能更對地球環境有貢獻都唔定。事實係在新能源出現在市場前,美國國民對石油消費行為相信都不會有咩大改變。對石油的需求沒有太大改動下,供應量就需要維持。美國自己開取,使用的技術我會假設係比較先進,加上有左派在旁等住捉雞腳,美國開取石油會比非洲中東那邊會更干凈有效。這對整個地球環境都係好的。美國自己消費得最多石油,不過自己有石油能源又唔去開取,一味購買中東非洲的原油,係咪中東非洲那邊的環境就可以唔重視呢?我唔係否認環境污染氣候變暖等事實(這其中氣候變暖的原因是否人為的爭議我就唔在這裏展開),但我覺得左派對解決問題的方法,好值得深思其實效。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-83109472817892964812008-09-13T00:58:00.000-07:002008-09-13T00:58:00.000-07:00謝謝囉。我想﹐你既苦心唔會白費的。 :)一&二﹐我不是太care。而三﹐是我想聽的。其實﹐i...謝謝囉。我想﹐你既苦心唔會白費的。 :)<BR/><BR/>一&二﹐我不是太care。而三﹐是我想聽的。<BR/><BR/>其實﹐if we live in an ideal world﹐ 我是極傾左的。But we are not living in an ideal world。(其實共產主義真的好好﹐只不過是行不通的。) 然後我想我不太知道那個 balance 應該在那。有沒有聽過 political compass? (<A HREF="http://green-space.blogspot.com/2007/10/political-compass.html" REL="nofollow">I had blogged it</A>.) I do know that my views are closer to the Democratic, but something McCain said in the convention also kind of struck me. (Dxxx, I forgot what he said, but was close to something 「你比政府更懂得如何去花你自己的錢」.) So that kind of kept me thinking. <BR/><BR/>Well, I guess I will keep my ears open in the next two months, but sometimes, I'm sick and tired of all those irrelevant news. It would be more helpful if they can just lay it all out there where do they stand or not.ah-yunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11879379535792421382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13832900.post-39265601009258631502008-09-12T23:28:00.000-07:002008-09-12T23:28:00.000-07:00你對香港的立法會選舉有什麽看法?你對香港的立法會選舉有什麽看法?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com